Main

March 13, 2006

Meeting Nadir

10 June 2003


[Editor's Note: Nadir is a citizen of Pakistan who was working in Philadelphia as a truck driver sending money home to support his wife and children. He was arrested in a raid at a house described in this dispatch and taken to a prison facility in Texas and kept there without being charged with any crime for more than eight months. It was a case of mistaken identity and gross negligence for which our government has neither apologized, nor made any restitution. After reading about his ordeal in The Philadelphia Inquirer, I started a fund for Nadir to help offset his financial losses. This dispatch records the first of three meetings where I was able to give him checks from that fund. totaling $1.720.]

When I called to set a meeting time, I was struck by how Nadir's desire to accommodate me overshadowed other unspoken pressures he was facing. I guessed it had to do with work, so I made sure that he found a time that didn't conflict with it. Finally we agreed on Saturday afternoon. It occurred to me only later that he might have to take off work to meet with me anyway. I hoped that wasn't the case, but I feared it was.

Nadir (pronounced nah-dear) lives in a hardscrabble neighborhood in the shadows of old Veteran's Stadium in Southeast Philadelphia. The streets are narrow to begin with and the cars parked on both sides of the street made barely enough room me to navigate through. I found a place to park in his block - a miracle.

The rain blurred my glasses for a minute so I had trouble making out the address numbers... there was 2316 and 2320 on either side of the storefront, so this must be it, 2318. The tiles on the façade were dark, blackened either by intention or neglect was impossible to know, but above the door in sharp relief was a sign made of white tiles. The sign read Bon Ton Hosiery and Lingerie. I remember thinking that it has been a long time since there were any good times in this neighborhood. It is a harsh world, the world that many foreign nationals enter into when they first arrive in Philadelphia.

Not sure for a moment if I had the correct address or even the right street, it occurred to me that this was the neighborhood where many of my relatives lived a few generations ago. This part of the city was the toehold, the place to gain purchase in this land of opportunity. Now it seems to have taken on the quality of a place for the permanent underclass. If there is toehold, it is meant to keep from sliding further into poverty and homelessness rather than a launching pad into the middle class. The neighborhood does not seem to show any signs of hopefulness for its residents. The street seems to say, Get use to me. I'm as good as it gets for you here. This tide of immigrants will have a much tougher time pursuing the American Dream than my family did, and if half the tales I heard are true, they had an unspeakably difficult time.

All this was going though my mind when I heard my name being called.

Bounding across the street was a man with a slight build, wearing a dark sweater and work pants. His black hair is flecked with grey. He had a tentative look on his face, but even with that he also had a smile. "Are you Edd?" he asked even before he finished crossing the street. I said yes, and he then greeted me with a warm hug, and said, "I thought that was you. I knew when I saw you coming down the street who you were." I immediately let go of the feeling of being a stranger in the neighborhood. I felt welcomed.

Nadir unlocked the gate that guarded the entry into his house. We walked down a short hallway, took off our shoes and entered his living room. Three old couches lined two walls of the room. In one corner was a television with some videos piled next to it. I smiled when I saw them remembering Gaiutra's remark in her story about how the marshals mistook his Bollywood tapes for suspicious Arabic ones. Strange given that the tapes are from India, and neither Indians nor Pakistanis speak Arabic. The convergence of arrogance, stupidity and the PATRIOT Act, I suspect. I sat on the couch adjoining his and we began a conversation that had an odd familiarity to it. It was as if this was a reunion after a long absence rather than a meeting for the first time. We spoke of our lives, our families and our work - only touching slightly on politics.

Nadir spoke lovingly about his children at home. He hesitated for a moment before talking about the fact that they had to leave school because the family had run out of money while he was in custody. For a moment he thought of going upstairs to get some pictures to show me. And then he remembered - the federal agents tore through all the belongings of everyone he shared the house with. He didn't know where the pictures were. He was still sorting through all the possessions that were jumbled together. "Next time you come, I will show you." I was pleased at the thought of a next time and said, "Yes, I would very much like to see their pictures."

He told me that he was last back in Pakistan to be with his wife and family four years ago. "What we do here is work and come home to watch videos. Six days a week, that is what we do..."

Then he asked me if I wanted some tea. I said yes, but hen added, "But please not so much sugar. I have had tea made by your countrymen before and it is way too much sugar for me." Nadir smiled and said, "Yes, I know. So much sugar. I will add only a little." Having no choice in the matter, I trusted that his idea of a little and mine would not be too far off.

When he brought in the tea, we then began to talk about why I was there. First I spoke to him about how outraged people who heard his story were. I told him how ashamed I was that he was treated that way in my country by my government. And then I gave him the check, telling him that I hoped this was the first of several that I could give to him. He took the check and laid it down gently on the coffee table in front of him, and was silent for a moment. I took a folded piece of paper from my pocket and laid it flat on the table. It was the spreadsheet with all the names of the people who had contributed so far to his fund. I showed him that they came from all over the country. From Philadelphia. From New England, Chicago, Alabama and California. His eyed welled up as he spoke haltingly about how grateful he was for the help. I told him how grateful I was, and all those who have contributed to his fund were, to be able to do it. He understood, smiled and nodded. And then we sat quietly for a bit and drank our tea. It was perfect.

I then began to ask him some questions about his ordeal. Even though the newspaper article gave many of the same details, it was more powerful hearing it from him, and being where it occurred. I could see the broken legs of the coffee table, and the pile of tapes still in disarray.

Nadir spent seventeen days in a facility in Philadelphia before being flown to Texas. There he languished for seven months. Finally, the real criminal they were looking for was long gone, he was released and he was flown back to Philadelphia. He didn't want to go into detail and I did want to impose. I did ask him how the authorities found him. He was told by one of the agents that they found his name in the phone book. He spells his first name differently than the other Nadar, and "Khan" is like "Smith" in Pakistan. But no matter. They arrested him anyway.

Upon his return to Philadelphia he was greeted with the chaos of his possessions having been ransacked. The agents left both the front and back doors unlocked and open. They stayed that way for several weeks - an open invitation for looters. His car was also left on the street for three months. It was ticketed repeatedly before it was also broken into and ransacked. Eventually, it was towed away by the city. He got a bill from the towing service for more than the car is now worth.

I sat quietly for a bit to let him collect his thoughts. Then he made the harshest comment about America he was to make during the entire conversation. He said, "In America there are many good people, and a few bad ones." That was it. That was as harsh and critical as he would get. I sat in awe of this simple man who in that moment was teaching me so much about authentic humility, and how integrity and dignity can remain intact even in the face of callousness, fear, hatred and maybe worst of all, indifference.

We talked for a few more minutes about the future. He said that he wanted to stay in America for a while longer to tie up the legal loose ends following his release. His wife wanted him to come home right away, but remarkably he in no rush to leave. But I could see in his face that the ordeal has taken its toll on him. "Maybe it is time that I go home. Maybe now is the time..."

We returned to the hallway together to retrieve our shoes. He walked with me to the street. We made plans to meet again soon. I said that I hoped it was with a larger check next time. He said it didn't matter. "It is good that you come again."

"It is good," I said, as I hugged him good-bye. Then I turned and put my hood up and stepped out into the misty rain and back into the world.


© 2003 Edd Conboy & HigherPortal

Dispatch 4.1

8 May 2003

These are troubling times, these post-war times we are now in. Or are they pre-war times? I suspect in the 1920s and early ‘30s our parents and grandparents thought they were in post-war times as well. Little did they know. It is in times like these, times of uncertainty and dramatic shifts of political realities, that we need to look for models, perhaps even heroes, to help us wend our way through this dark thicket. I was looking for just such a hero when my friend here in Philadelphia, Katie Day, offered me one of hers. For those of you who do not have the good fortune to know Katie, she is many things – a mother, a teacher, a scholar, and not to be overlooked, an ordained minister as well. So, as I was grappling with all this aftermath of the war, Katie was kind enough to share with me her hero, Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Bonhoeffer’s story is a complex one, and only someone with Katie’s credentials should tell it at all. What I want to focus on is what she told me about him, and a little of what I gleaned from his writings from prison. In a nutshell (I hope I get this right, Katie!) Bonhoeffer was a Lutheran theologian and a pacifist. He migrated intellectually and spiritually from a rather dispassionate, almost tangential, relationship to the world, to a profoundly passionate, totally committed actor in the world determined to, as he said, not tolerate the intolerable. This great thinker, a product of that time between two wars, eventually was arrested and later executed after a foiled plot to kill Hitler, and thereby end the suffering of so many in Europe.

But to me what makes this man truly remarkable was his faith in the face of so much ambiguity. To the very end of his life he did not succumb to the crutch of religious certainty, but held steadfast to his convictions all the while doubting and questioning. And that is what I hold as the profound learning from (as Katie calls him) this Lutheran saint. It is not about the rightness or wrongness of his actions in this particular case, but in his capacity to act with conviction, even when such an act might mean the loss of everything he holds dear – including his conscience.

Bonhoeffer himself would no doubt bristle at the characterization of sainthood. In one of his letters he mentions this and then goes on to point us in the correct direction in these darkening times. He writes,
“I remember a conversation that I had in America... With a young French pastor. We were asking ourselves quite simply what we wanted to do with our lives. He said he would like to become a saint (and I think it is quite likely that he did become one). At the time I was very impressed, but I disagreed with him, and said, in effect, that I should like to learn to have faith. For a long time I didn’t realize the depth of contrast. I thought I could acquire faith by trying to live a holy life, or something like it...

I discovered later, and I’m still discovering right up to this moment, that it is only by living completely in this world that one learns to have faith. One must completely abandon any attempts to make something of oneself, whether it be a saint, or a converted sinner... A righteous man or an unrighteous one, a sick man or a healthy one. By this-worldliness I mean living unreservedly in life's duties, problems, successes and failures, experiences and perplexities...”

Of course Bonhoeffer was speaking of faith in God, and or specifically faith in a Christian God. But I believe that his words have meaning even in the secular realm as well. In a way he is making faith an action, a way of living rather than a way of being. Each of us must find our own “worldliness”, and move into action politically and or spiritually in whichever ways are authentically our own. But he does seem to say that acquiescence in the face of intolerance is intolerable, and standing mute in the face of injustice is unacceptable.

For the past few weeks, while these dispatches have been dormant, I have been asking people I know what they think of humanity as a whole. I’ve been asking them if they believe that we, as a species, are developing morally, or are we pretty much the same as we have always been through the ages. It’s a difficult question. Probably impossible to answer, but I appreciate all those who joined me in the struggle. Curiously, it was many of the people in the “moral development business” who seemed to think that we haven’t moved the needle on the moral meter very far. What I took away from those conversations is the likely possibility that, even if we have not matured all that much morally and ethically since the time of our ancestors, we have created structures and systems to better protect ourselves from ourselves. We have constructed laws, rituals and ethical systems that make it more difficult for our basest instincts to hold sway. And if that is the case, then I fear that they may be breaking down, as those in power today seem to be deconstructing some of those important safeguards.

Such things as the PATRIOT Act that is now up for renewal in Congress, is in reality a deconstruction, a devolution rather than an evolution in our development. It is acquiescing to fear as opposed to safeguarding hard won liberties. It is a reminder of how tenuous our purchase is on the slippery stepping-stones out of the chaos and carnage of our recent past. We need to do all we can to have this act repealed, to ensure that some of the most vulnerable in our society are protected from the harassment that is the inevitable outgrowth of unbridled power. These recent immigrants as well as outspoken critics of this regime, visitors, foreign students and guests, all contribute immeasurably to this wild and wonderful conversation we call a country, and they deserve such protections as much as anyone else. We already had sufficient laws in place to deal with those who choose to cross the line beyond legitimate political discourse, or even those who wish harm to this country. In this case we need to repel this act to again protect ourselves from ourselves.

So, we do have models, beacons who have lit the way for us. Bonhoeffer is but one. Yet this is our time and not theirs. We cannot, we must not, blindly follow those paths, no matter how “correct” they appear with the gift of historical perspective. But we can ask some of the same questions they did, questions about evil and justice, and the meaning of suffering, and the morality of violence. And even here Bonhoeffer weighs in:
“We have been silent witnesses of evil deeds; we have been drenched by many storms; we have learnt the arts of equivocation and pretense; experience has made us suspicious of others and kept us from being truthful and open; intolerable conflicts have worn us down and even made us cynical. Are we still of any use? What we shall need is not geniuses, or cynics, or misanthropes, or clever tacticians, but plain, honest, straightforward men [sic]. Will our inward power of resistance be strong enough, and our honesty with ourselves remorseless enough, for us to find our way back to simplicity and straightforwardness?”

Good questions, don’t you think? And thanks, Katie, for letting me borrow your saint for a bit.

Be careful out there.

Edd

PS And a long overdue thank you to Jane & Colette Swim, my good friends from the Bay Area, for their steady stream of links, insightful comments, and kind and supportive words. Keep ‘em coming.

PPS If you feel so inclined, please feel free to forward this to friends and colleagues. But once you have received a forwarded HigherPortal and you would like to receive future dispatches, please contact me via e-mail (address below). I’d like to have some idea as to who is receiving these. Thanks.

PPPS If you are receiving this and do not wish to be on the list, my apologies. Please let me know and I’ll take you off the list right away.

© Edd Conboy 2003
econboy@earthlink.net


Links:

Patriot Raid
AlterNet , US | Jason Halperin,
First person account of how the PATRIOT Act is sometimes implemented.
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15770

What is Victory?
ashbrook.org, US | David Tucker
A view of the Iraqi war from the perspective of the conservative think tank, The Ashbrook Center.
http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/tucker/03/victory.html

Cheney oil firm widens Iraq role
The Guardian, UK | Oliver Burkeman
Kellogg Brown and Root, aka Halliburton, is already back in the oil business in Iraq.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,951383,00.html

Cashing in on Reconstruction
Al Jazeera
The Bechtel Group is also at the trough. (The article fails to mention that George Schultz is the former chairman of Bechtel and still on the board, but it does bring Cheney into the picture.) It also points out that “foreign” companies cannot be contractors in the Iraqi reconstruction effort. Aren’t American companies foreign as well?
http://english.aljazeera.net/topics/article.asp?cu_no=1&item_no=2813&version=1&template_id=263&parent_id=258

Rep. Waxman Questions Halliburton Ties To Terrorism
truthout.org US
Most of you get Truthout regularly, but just in case you missed this one, Rep. Waxman poses some disturbing questions to Rumsfeld.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/050603C.shtml

Some BBC dispatches worth noting:

Roadmap ‘failing on human rights’
BBC, Jerusalem | David Chazan
Human Rights Watch says the plan needs work.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3009305.stm

US troops ‘encouraged’ Iraqi looters
BBC News Online, Nasiriya, Iraq | Jonathon Duffy
Some American forces may not have been just indifferent bystanders.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3003393.stm

Appeal at looted Iraq nuclear site
BBC News World Edition
Here is the good news: “ Workers say the looters did not appear to be after the uranium, only the containers it was kept in...”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3005913.stm


Dispatch 3.1

17 April 2003

In the two weeks since the last dispatch I spent the time looking for sources of inspiration. After all Passover is upon us and Easter is fast approaching. If this is not a season for inspiration, what other time would be better? But even in times such as this, inspiration is hard to come by. Inspiration does not generate ambivalence. Rather it allows for clarity, if not certainty. Yet so much that has happened in these last two weeks is the source of layer upon layer of ambivalence sandwiched between moments of deep sadness.

How would it be possible to grieve at the passing of Saddam’s regime? After all, the fact that the Iraqi people are no longer nailed to that cross of tyranny is a good thing, isn’t it? The short answer is yes. The longer answer, like many longer answers, is that the devil is still in the details. And how can anyone not feel deep empathy, not only for the families of the civilians who have died or have been injured, but also for the pain and suffering endured by the Iraqi conscripts trapped as they were between two forces that cared little for their welfare? The short answer here is that it is not possible to feel so and still have even a shred of humanity left.

“The War” such as it was, is now over. And the oil fields are secure. And the museums are gone. And the hospitals have been looted. And the enemy has been routed. And the victors have their spoils. And now what?

How does a country recreate itself when its history is erased? How can American leaders say that they came to “liberate” a people, and yet stand by and watch a culture become chained to a legacy of loss, of broken pots, of illustrated catalogues that can now only mark what was, of what used to be in this glass case or on that top shelf? We in America have a cultural legacy that can be measured seemingly in minutes compared with the thousand upon thousands of years that comprise the birthplace of civilization. Yet now many of the markers of that past, a past that we all share to one extent or another, have been shattered by a sledgehammer of pent-up Iraqi rage slamming down upon them as they lay on an anvil of American indifference.

What disturbs me most is the lack of accountability that exists with all this. This Bush regime, in its harsh and bitter renunciation of moral relativism, prides itself on being “responsible”, and morally certain. Prides itself on being good, holy and righteous. It is a regime that goes to great lengths to make sure that the young mother on welfare takes responsibility for her choices. It is hell bent on holding teachers “accountable” as they try in vain to “leave no child behind”. This regime is equally committed to sending checks to the wealthiest at the expense of some of the poorest and most vulnerable in our society. Their monosyllabic clichés are mind numbing. Their hypocrisy is disturbing. Their rationalizations, evasions and arrogant deceptions are alarming.

They will speak of “the fog of war” to avoid responsibility for the civilian casualties. They will speak of the tremendous lengths they went to avoid such casualties. Yet they rushed into this war in great haste. And it turns out that this haste may have been partially the reason for leaving so many of Iraq’s treasures vulnerable to thieves and plunderers. The military leaders in the field to be sure bear some of the responsibility for this tragedy. But ultimately the responsibility leads to the Oval Office, and the outermost ring of the Pentagon. They were warned repeatedly of the likelihood of the looting, and they did nothing to prevent it, and then nothing to stop it.

My artist friends (and I daresay I am blessed to have many) will be quick to correct me if I am wrong, but I believe it was Picasso who said that, if one were to come upon a room that was on fire and that room contained one of his paintings and a cat, and if one were forced to make a choice, he advised, “Save the cat.” If the loss of all the artifacts in the museums, and all the ancient Islamic manuscripts in the libraries would have saved the life of a single Iraqi child, then I would have heeded Picasso’s advice and say, Let the manuscript burn. Save the child. Instead, just as so many manuscripts went up in flames, many Iraqi children and adults were not spared either. Those that were spared are now orphans, their heritage in ashes, their connections to the deepest source of who they are as a people now severed.

“The War” such as it was, is now over. And the oil fields are secure. And the museums are gone. And the hospitals have been looted. And the enemy has been routed. And the victors have their spoils.

And now what?

Be careful out there.

Edd

PS If you feel so inclined, please feel free to forward this to friends and colleagues. But once you have received a forwarded HigherPortal and you would like to receive future dispatches, please contact me via e-mail (address below). I’d like to have some idea as to who is receiving these. Thanks.

PPS If you are receiving this and do not wish to be on the list, my apologies. Please let me know and I’ll take you off the list right away.

© Edd Conboy 2003
econboy@earthlink.net



Links:

Why the war
Al-Ahram, Egypt | Tony Blair
Prime Minister Blair makes his case for war in the Egyptian press.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/633/op10.htm
Who will history favour?
Al-Ahram, Egypt | Ibrahim Nafie
The Editor-in-Chief of Al-Ahram responds.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/print/2003/633/op11.htm

Tales of the Tyrant
The Atlantic Monthly | Mark Bowden
This is now a somewhat dated piece on Saddam (May 2002). I missed it on the first go round, but it is still a good read. Among other things, Mark is the author of Black Hawk Down. His most notable achievement, though, is that he is a fellow graduate of Loyola College in Maryland.
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/05/bowden.htm
Depression - And Its Activism Antidote
Scoop, New Zealand | Bernard Weiner
When worlds collide – in those case the worlds of personal, political and economic depression.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0304/S00058.htm

Baghdad: the day after
The Independent, UK | Robert Fisk
Commentary on the “liberation” of Iraq.
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=396051

When Democracy Failed: The Warnings of History
CommonDreams.org | Thom Hartmann
Some eerie parallels between now and Germany in the early thirties.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0316-08.htm

Proposed legislation by Congressman Serrano (D-NY)
“The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.” A Democrat wants to repeal the amendment limiting the president to two terms in office. Go figure.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.11.IH:

Terrorism Task Force Detains an American Without Charges
The New York Times | Timothy Egan
Here we go again: “Maher Hawash, American citizen born in West Bank and brought up in Kuwait, has been held in federal prison on Portland, Ore, for last two weeks, though he has not been charged with crime or brought before judge…”
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20915FE3C5C0C778CDDAD0894DB404482

No Quiz this time… spring break

Dispatch 2.1

2 April 2003

Analogies, historical or otherwise, are tricky things. I never did well on those SAT questions. You know the ones, "Fly is to paper as mouse is to ..." Magazine? Book? Trap? Cardboard? That said, I'll try on a few analogies in light of this War on Iraq, and the suddenly diminished "War on Terror". So hang in there with me for a minute.

A number of years ago the Chinese government invaded Tibet, hell-bent on ending the spiritual and political influence of Tibetan Buddhism in general, and the Tibetan lamas in particular. After invading the country, they ransacked the monasteries and committed any number of unspeakable crimes against these peaceful people. Oil-free as Tibet is, the American government remained pretty much silent about this. No saber rattling in that case. No talk of "liberating Tibet". Not a peep.

So what was the outcome of this campaign to rid the country of this Buddhist influence? Many of the lamas (I believe there are about twenty four in all), including the Dalai Lama, escaped from Tibet. And now these lamas have traveled throughout the world, and have spread their beliefs in non-violence, and spiritual liberation through non-attachment throughout the world. Their work highlights the injustices of the Chinese government, and bears witness to their struggle for freedom. The Chinese campaign was an abysmal failure, as many Tibetans continue to hold fast to their traditions and beliefs.

In 1992 I had the good fortune to do some work with an Olympic athlete at the Barcelona Games. You might recall that was when the so-called "Dream Team" competed in the basketball competition. Led by Michael Jordon and a panoply of NBA stars, there was little, if any, doubt about the outcome of the medal round. Members of the European Olympic Federation were questioned about their support for this decision. They said that they knew by agreeing to have these all-stars participate, their teams would be battling for the silver and the bronze medals. But they also said something that revealed their longer-term view of the situation. They said that for them the most important thing was for Europeans, especially young people, to see European teams competing on the same floor with the best team in the world. That is what would be remembered. Not the score. Not the so-called "defeat", but the fact that they were in the same game on the same court with these superhuman athletes.

At the risk of making the obvious perfectly clear (something I'm told I'm particularly good at), allow me to connect the dots.

Because we decided to declare war on al Qaeda instead of looking at their behavior as criminal, we fragmented an already decentralized organization, almost certainly making efforts to eradicate this organization even less likely now than before. And their deadly messages filled with hatred and revenge will find fertile ground among many disenfranchised throughout the world. One can only hope that the good works of the lamas will offset some of these messages.

And now we come to "Saddam vs. the Dream Team". He will not win, but he already has achieved more than he could have imagined. He is on the same battlefield with the best in the world, and his henchmen have managed to make this cakewalk into a real war. In the face of so much humiliation that the Arab world has experienced, no doubt many young people will see this in a very different light than Americans and British do. Every day these brutal men are able to lure American and British forces into killing civilians, Saddam is achieving some of his ends. Those young people who have seen so many Arab casualties their whole lives see every coalition casualty a bit differently.

I see one possible future unfolding so clearly. This war will end slowly, sloppily and raggedly. No surrender on a great battleship. This war will "end" the way the Afghan war didn't end. Americans come in as "liberators". Soon enough (it is happening already) they need to defend themselves from these liberated people. Eventually the Iraqi people will be seen as the potential enemy, and later as possible "terrorists", or "suicide bombers". In time America will find itself in the same quagmire that the Israelis find themselves in Palestine. It will be reminiscent of how Jefferson looked on problem of slavery in America - he said it was a bit like holding a wolf by the ears, impossible to hold on to it forever, but too dangerous to let it go.

And then here in America the social fabric will continue to coarsen. Individuals (including me) will become even more positioned. More violence will be visited upon this country. More repression in the name of freedom. More lies in the name of truth. More war in the name of peace.

The political is personal to me. So even with this pessimistic vision I am nagged by a number of questions. Is this the only possible outcome I can envision? If so, why is that? Am I so invested in my disdain for these leaders on all sides that I see no hopeful signs on the horizon? What would have to change in me in order for me to see any other possibilities? Just how much of the political is personal to me?

Maybe the hopefulness I am looking for lies in one of the analogies above. In the infinite long run (as my Jesuit teachers used to say) maybe the best bet is on the Tibetan lamas.

Put a candle in the window until the troops come home and until the poor, desolate Iraqi people come to know some of the peace and joy that many of us used to take for granted.

Be careful out there.

Edd

PS If you feel so inclined, please feel free to forward this to friends and colleagues. But once you have received a forwarded HigherPortal and you would like to receive future dispatches, please contact me via e-mail (address below). I'd like to have some idea as to who is receiving these. Thanks.

PPS If you are receiving this and do not wish to be on the list, my apologies. Please let me know and I'll take you off the list right away.

econboy@earthlink.net


Some good reads:

Tinderbox, U.S. Middle East Policy and the Roots of Terrorism, by Stephen Zunes
Common Courage Press, 2003
This is one of the most thorough analysis of American Middle East Policy I have encountered. Professor Zunes is an associate professor of Politics and chair of the Peace and Justice Studies Program at the University of San Francisco.

Target Iraq: What the News Media Didn't Tell You, by Norman Soloman and Reese Erlich, Context Books, 2003
A pretty good read. It has a very good discussion of depleted uranium and its use in modern American ordinance. It lacks any footnotes, which is a severe limitation in my mind.

In the Presence of Fear, Three Essays for a Changed World, by Wendell Berry
The Orion Society. 2001
Berry is a wonderful writer, and this little book is crammed with thought provoking nuggets.

Bin Laden, Islam and America's New "War on Terrorism", by As ad AbuKhalil
Seven Stories Press, 2002
In less than 100 pages the author crams more astute analysis than in books I've read three times as long. Well thought out and carefully footnoted.)

Poems for Refugees, edited by Pippa Haywood
Vintage 2002
(I got this at the airport in London. Not sure if it is in the US yet. A fabulous anthology of poems selected by various artists, poets, actors and so forth.)

If you have any "good reads", send them my way and I'll get the word out.

Thanks

Links:

Iraq: The quagmire begins?
The Daily Star Lebanon | Shafeeq Ghabra
An Arab perspective about quagmire building.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/opinion/02_04_03_c.asp

No Way Out
Every likely outcome of this war is a disaster
Guardian UK | George Monbiot
Some possible outcomes to the ear that are even more pessimistic than my own.
http://www.monbiot.com/

Volunteers still lining up for Iraq as first local victim is laid to rest
Baath party in baalbek begins registering names
The Daily Star Lebanon | Alia Ibrahim
Thousands of bin Ladens to follow in the footsteps of these volunteers?
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/02_04_03/art2.asp

Practice to Deceive
The Washington Monthly | Joshua Micah Marshall
"Chaos in the Middle East is not the Bush hawks' nightmare scenario--it's their plan."
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0304.marshall.html

Mark Twain's "War Prayer"
Every prayer that pleads for God to take one side is also a plea for God to abandon the other. Twain was an opponent of what became known as The Spanish American War - a war that is eerily like this one. He wrote this story/prayer after that war. It was not published until after his death.
http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/making/warprayer.html

What Is the Geneva Convention?
Slate.com | Brendan I. Koerner
Good analysis of the Geneva Conventions and its relevance to this war.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2080617/

The Quiz

The Geneva Conventions has garnered more signatures (189) than any other treaty except one. Which one has more signatures?
A. The Kyoto Accords
B. The Convention on the Rights of the Child
C. The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty
D. The Rio Treaty
E. The International Monetary Fund Agreement

Bonus question:
Only two countries did not sign this treaty. Which two?
1. United States
2. Iraq
3. Somalia
4. Iran
5. North Korea

Last Quiz:

Who said, "We have put a shingle outside our door saying, 'Superpower lives here'"?
A. W
B. Cheney
C. Powell
D. Rumsfeld
E. Wolfowitz

Answer: C Powell (After the invasion of Panama.)

Dispatch 2.0

In the Midlands, England
23 March 2003

Hi all

If you want to know about a Mercedes, you best go to a Mercedes dealership and ask a bunch of questions. If you want to know about an empire, you had best go to one and ask a lot of questions. So that is what I did in England this past week. I visited a few early churches, and a stone circle ala Stonehenge. Had a proper English lunch of sausage with bubbles and squeak (you don't even want to know) in a proper English pub, and I asked as many questions as I could from the remnants of the last great empire, you know, the one that the sun never set on... only it does now.

One thing I learned right away about empires is that they rise and fall. The other thing I learned is that you never quite know when the rise began. Most empires, or so they tell me, grew through military conquest, and then only later were there social and economic bits added to the mix. Every time we were driving through the lovely English countryside and I would remark about what a pleasant road we were on, my friends would say, "Well, of course, it is a Roman road." Every fourteen to sixteen miles we would come upon a large village. This happens to be the distance that a Roman legion would travel in a day. I wondered how long our roads will last - two or three thousand years? Except for some of the Indian trails that we have turned into roads, probably not.

And so now what are we to make of this new empire of ours in the making? It's already different. America did the economic and social conquest first. Only afterwards has it begun the military bit of world domination. What shall it be called? I'll leave that to the marketing and branding folks at the White House. I suspect they are already working on it? Something to do with the New American Century perhaps. And no doubt it will have the word "peace" in it. "Perpetual war for perpetual peace", as historian Charles Beard said so prophetically in 1947 about modern US foreign policy.

So watching events from the remnants of a fallen empire you see things a bit differently. I watched the bombing of Baghdad, "the bloody onslaught" as the headline in one British paper said. I don't suspect American media called the invasion "an onslaught", but I may be mistaken.

So there we were on the first full day of spring walking through the beautiful Midland countryside. The onslaught was well under way by then. It was a warm morning, yet still had a hint of crispness to the air. If ever the word "serene" could be attached to a place, it could be attached to that place at that moment. My friend, Andrea, began to speak quietly. She said, " It is in my folk memory (English people have such things as folk memories as it turns out) that it was on a day just like this that so many boys left for the trenches in the Great War. They were going to their deaths and they knew it. Funny eh, that I would think of that?"

There were a few other stories that I suspect didn't make it into the media in America. Fortunately, you didn't see the pictures of the twelve-year-old boy from Basra with the top of his head missing. But many people in Europe and the Middle East did. Nor, fortunately, did you see the "interviews" of the American POWs. I was outraged that the Iraqis did that (even though they did not sign the Geneva conventions). I was outraged when the North Vietnamese did it to captured American airmen. Just as I was outraged when we paraded "unlawful combatants" past cameras Camp X-ray. It may be worth noting that in the first two cases those doing the parading were themselves on the receiving end of American bombs.

So there we were having a proper English lunch in a proper English pub talking about the bombing. There was no talk of "shock and awe" here. More like "dismay and disgust". You see, many of the folks here either remember, or grew up in the rubble of a previous iteration of "shock and awe" - the German bombing of England in World War II. And we weren't far from Coventry, where the magnificent cathedral there was shocked and awed into oblivion. And then there was talk of "smart bombs". I concluded from the conversation that only in America would those two words be linked without the least bit of sarcasm. As an American, it is terribly difficult to be at all self-aware sitting in a proper English pub having a proper English lunch and not feel a bit simplistic and naïve.

And then I thought again of September 11th. In a way America was attacked by some of the smartest bombs imaginable. They were guided to their targets with pinpoint precision, and scored direct hits in three of the four cases. From the point of view of those bombs there was no collateral damage - the bombs did exactly what they were intended to do. All those lives ended with such clear, stark and brutal intentionality. Such is the stuff of smart bombs.

So there we were at the Rollright Stones in Warwickshire. This stone circle is less well known than Stonehenge, and so in a way it is more accessible and perhaps more interesting. There is great mystery to these places. Where did the stones come from? What were they for? Who were the people who engineered these circles, and what were they like? How did they get these stones here from wherever they came from? And then I thought that about the same time these folks were putting rocks one on top of another in these circles, an ancient civilization was emerging just south of what is now Baghdad some five thousand years ago. Only no one was now standing in silent awe at what those ancient people had created. No contemplation. No questions. It occurred to me in that moment some site just as important, a marker of who we were, of where we are from, probably was being obliterated. Such it is in war, all thoughts lead back to the carnage and the suffering. In that moment the people in Iraq - American, British and Iraqi people - were all together somehow in the middle of this circle.

Finally, we went to visit the great Lincoln Cathedral in Lincolnshire. It is old by any reckoning, even by English standards. As you stand in front of the great doors to the cathedral and look up at the stonework - its massiveness and its fine detail, or as you look up at the incredibly ornate stained glass windows, or as you stand outside and listen to the choir practice for Evensong, you can't help but feel as countless generations of ordinary folk must have felt a they did the same thing, you can't help but feel awe.

And then I realized that just as "smart bomb" is a uniquely American phrase, so is "shock and awe". I am often shocked at what we humans will do to each other, but I am awed when I am in the presence of a power that is beyond words, or human comprehension.

We Americans have a lot to learn about so many things, awe being near the top of the list.

Keep in touch

Edd


PS If you feel so inclined, please feel free to forward this to friends and colleagues. But once you have received a forwarded HigherPortal and you would like to receive future dispatches, please contact me via e-mail (address below). I'd like to have some idea as to who is receiving these. Thanks.

PPS If you are receiving this and do not wish to be on the list, my apologies. Please let me know and I'll take you off the list right away.

econboy@earthlink.net

No Links to the war in this dispatch. I'll catch up on my reading next week.

http://www.rollrightstones.co.uk/
http://www.lincolncathedral.com/